Who amongst us
as bona-fide car enthusiasts wouldn’t like to be like Jay Leno the
former American chat show host? I’m sure all
will be familiar not only with the man himself but also his awe-inducing
collection of cars that he keeps in a purpose-built facility in Los Angeles.
If you’re not aware then go and visit his website ‘Jay’s Garage’ and see for yourself the massive range of unique, rare, bizarre and desirable motors he has at his disposal. What a lucky man. Whether you’d want to own them all – with the massive maintenance charges involved - is debatable but I’m sure if you had free reign there’s one or two you’d happily drive off in!
If you’re not aware then go and visit his website ‘Jay’s Garage’ and see for yourself the massive range of unique, rare, bizarre and desirable motors he has at his disposal. What a lucky man. Whether you’d want to own them all – with the massive maintenance charges involved - is debatable but I’m sure if you had free reign there’s one or two you’d happily drive off in!
Regular
readers will have noted I occasionally reference cars I’d put in ‘Anthony’s Garage’ and most are fairly mundane compared to some of the
exotic American confections Leno has access to. To be honest, I’m not a massive fan of Yankee Classics finding many to be rather gauche and,
in some cases, egregious and vulgar. So the chances are that I’d turn my nose up at a lot of Jay’s collection.
However, at
Gawsworth a couple of year’s ago I saw an American car which actually took my
fancy; the Chevrolet Corvair Corsa, a car I’d never encountered before. The sky blue version on display was not only very pretty but was highly
unusual as it was one of the few rear engined, air cooled cars produced by the American car giants. Part of its
appeal for me was it’s not so long that you couldn’t feasibly park it in Costco and you might actually be
able to afford the ‘gas’ required to run it.
It reminded me a little of an Hillman Imp (which is a car I’d put in my collection) but one that had been sent to pimp-up heaven and returned as an insane, stretched out, fired-up shadow of its former self. What’s more it was for sale. And, just for a moment, my head suddenly filled with financial calculations that if I hadn’t pulled myself together might have had me negotiating with the owner. Luckily, good sense prevailed and we moved on after suitably complementing the vendor on his car.
It reminded me a little of an Hillman Imp (which is a car I’d put in my collection) but one that had been sent to pimp-up heaven and returned as an insane, stretched out, fired-up shadow of its former self. What’s more it was for sale. And, just for a moment, my head suddenly filled with financial calculations that if I hadn’t pulled myself together might have had me negotiating with the owner. Luckily, good sense prevailed and we moved on after suitably complementing the vendor on his car.
Later, when I
had a moment, I fired up t’internet and had a shufty around to find out more
about this automotive vision that had grabbed my attention (and very nearly my
money). Interestingly, it was a car that had been referenced
by the designers of the Imp as they were mapping out their rear engine effort
which I thought was a bit spooky. More startling though was that the Corvair is one of the
most controversial American Cars ever made. At this point I understood why my
interest had been piqued. I think I have an instinct that causes me to
gravitate towards cars that just don’t conform. Whether it’s their design, innovation, their
problematic nature or simply that they’re death traps. I seem to like them. Hmmm must ponder on that a bit more but for now let’s return to the Corvair.
The very early
model Corvairs (1960 – 63) were heavily criticised in a book called: Unsafe At Any Speed by
Ralph Nader (1965). The primary issue being the rear swing-axle suspension which, it was claimed, had the potential to ‘tuck under’ in extreme conditions making the car inherently dangerous at the driving
limits. Combined with the highly unequal pressures recommended for the front
and rear tires (intended to balance out the handling) this created, Nader
claimed, an accident waiting to happen. The alleged root cause was the insidiously prevalent trade-off between cost to build and safety that was used by US car manufacturers in an age when NCAP safety ratings and ‘moose tests’ were not such an issue. Nader's attack did materially affect the car’s reputation and sales to the point that the suspension was redesigned
in later models so perhaps in this case he did the American car buyer a favour.
As the controversy rolled on, tests carried out in the seventies by learned engineers on the suspect 1960 – 63 models, pronounced the Corvair was no more prone to safety issues than competitor cars such as the VW Beetle or Renault Dauphine. In the end this research did little to convince industry big wigs (including John Delorean) who agreed that Nader was largely right and declared the Corvair to be an ‘unsafe’ and ‘terrible’ car.
As the controversy rolled on, tests carried out in the seventies by learned engineers on the suspect 1960 – 63 models, pronounced the Corvair was no more prone to safety issues than competitor cars such as the VW Beetle or Renault Dauphine. In the end this research did little to convince industry big wigs (including John Delorean) who agreed that Nader was largely right and declared the Corvair to be an ‘unsafe’ and ‘terrible’ car.
Nader went
onto highlight many issues with contemporary American cars such as the danger
that elaborate internal and external ornamentation posed to drivers and
pedestrians. His arguments were often
very prescient and included now familiar issues such as the positive
effects that mandatory seat belt wearing would have on accident
survival and how cars contribute to pollution levels. All seem pretty reasonable
one would think but only when looked at with a modern day perspective. At the time the book was heavily attacked by the industry, many of its
claims were strongly refuted and Nader became the subject of harassment, blackmail
and personal attacks for which senior car industry figures were later forced to apologise.
As ever, in
these cases, there’s no clear cut outcome. Unsafe At Any Speed divided
opinion and has in the
intervening years been described
as one of the most harmful books of the twentieth century. Harmful to whom is the key question one thinks…
What is true
is that a Chevrolet Corvair made it to the car show I attended safely enough and Jay Leno
has a 1966 model in his garage so I can only leave it to posterity to decide
the ultimate fate of this conflicted car. Whether I’ll contribute financially to that debate
is, I think, now open to question.
Copyright Anthony Boe 2015. All Rights Reserved
Copyright Anthony Boe 2015. All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment